Saturday, January 24, 2026

What James Stirling and Bill McCartney agree on

On their Facebooks, Bill McCartney and James Stirling mutually subscribed to the following:
James Stirling and I had a productive conversation over beer and pizza between friends who see some of the world differently.
As the conversation unfolded it was interesting how much we actually agree on while beginning to understand each other’s perspectives.
Since we only know what we have been told by talking heads and internet chatter, we realized that neither of us knew the truth about some of our sticking points. So, we agreed to research/find the truth about whether ICE was breaking into homes and arresting people without legal authority and if illegals are being deported without due process.
Our elected officials, churches and other organizations don't appear to want to do anything to help heal our country’s divisions so, as it almost always is, it comes down to individuals to create a positive change among our circle of friends, communities, country....
We challenge everyone who reads this to have a talk, coupled with actually listening with someone you know who has a different political perspective. Find out what you agree and disagree on, then work to embrace the similarities while understanding the differences.
You too may be able to bring the temperature down between the two of you and improve your quality of life and for those you know and love. Please let us know if you accepted this challenge and how it turned out.

I wish to flesh out with Bill and James the things they agree on, and I will ask them here and on their Facebooks to try to do this. As this proceeds, I will record here what transpires. [to be continued]

Email to Friends re What James Stirling and Bill McCartney agree on
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: [sent to about 30 friends; email addresses redacted]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2026 at 10:13:25 AM CST
Subject: What James Stirling and Bill McCartney agree on
Friends,
On their Facebooks, Bill McCartney and James Stirling mutually subscribed to the following:
James Stirling and I had a productive conversation over beer and pizza between friends who see some of the world differently.
As the conversation unfolded it was interesting how much we actually agree on while beginning to understand each other’s perspectives.
Since we only know what we have been told by talking heads and internet chatter, we realized that neither of us knew the truth about some of our sticking points. So, we agreed to research/find the truth about whether ICE was breaking into homes and arresting people without legal authority and if illegals are being deported without due process.
Our elected officials, churches and other organizations don't appear to want to do anything to help heal our country’s divisions so, as it almost always is, it comes down to individuals to create a positive change among our circle of friends, communities, country....
We challenge everyone who reads this to have a talk, coupled with actually listening with someone you know who has a different political perspective. Find out what you agree and disagree on, then work to embrace the similarities while understanding the differences.
You too may be able to bring the temperature down between the two of you and improve your quality of life and for those you know and love. Please let us know if you accepted this challenge and how it turned out.
I am seeking to flesh out with Bill and James things they agree on, and I am memorializing this at Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: What James Stirling and Bill McCartney agree on.
Further I agree with Bill and James where they say," Our elected officials, churches and other organizations don't appear to want to do anything to help heal our country’s divisions so, as it almost always is, it comes down to individuals to create a positive change among our circle of friends, communities, country...."
Also, surprise of surprises, I am taking up the challenge Bill and James make "to have a talk, coupled with actually listening with someone you know who has a different political perspective. Find out what you agree and disagree on, then work to embrace the similarities while understanding the differences."
Thus, this email is to solicit talk with whoever is willing.
Please let me know.
Your Friend,
Rob

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now

Email to Auburn University President Christopher Roberts
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: president@auburn.edu <president@auburn.edu>
Cc: boles@auburn.edu <boles@auburn.edu>; editor@theplainsman.com <editor@theplainsman.com>; social@theplainsman.com <social@theplainsman.com>; ejr0030@auburn.edu <ejr0030@auburn.edu>; amm0357@auburn.edu <amm0357@auburn.edu>; lcm0061@auburn.edu <lcm0061@auburn.edu>; tstacy@aptv.org <tstacy@aptv.org>; Brian Lyman <blyman@alabamareflector.com>; yaffee@yellowhammernews.com <yaffee@yellowhammernews.com>; jmoon@alreporter.com <jmoon@alreporter.com>; Dale Jackson <dale@yellowhammernews.com>; rscott@aptv.org <rscott@aptv.org>; jsharp@al.com <jsharp@al.com>; blyman@gannett.com <blyman@gannett.com>; sbritt@alreporter.com <sbritt@alreporter.com>; bbritt@alreporter.com <bbritt@alreporter.com>; johnaarchibald@gmail.com <johnaarchibald@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2026 at 07:12:51 AM CST
Subject: Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now
Dear Auburn University President Roberts:
I am sending this email as a first email to try to carry out in Alabama the plea of Robert Reich (Professor, former Secretary of Labor, Co-founder Inequality Media, 4.8M followers on Facebook) that is posted at Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now against... | Facebook.
Robert Reich's plea is this:
"Everyone with authority must speak out now against Trump's depravity and lawlessness. Every elected official, university, professional association, charity, and foundation head. Every CEO. Every religious leader. If they don't, history will condemn their cowardice."
I have previously sent you emails (see Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Alabama debates what Eric Trump says about his father), and I am picking you as a first person of authority in Alabama to ask that you please speak out now against Trump's depravity and lawlessness.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
Mountain Brook

Email to University of Alabama President Peter J. Mohler the Alabama State Bar Executive Council
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: president@ua.edu <president@ua.edu>
Cc: lasikes@ua.edu <lasikes@ua.edu>; fhelmsing@joneswalker.com <fhelmsing@joneswalker.com>; jeff@rbmattorneys.com <jeff@rbmattorneys.com>; terri.lovell@alabar.org <terri.lovell@alabar.org>; jana@janagarner.com <jana@janagarner.com>; rbell@maynardnexsen.com <rbell@maynardnexsen.com>; jc@strengthconnally.com <jc@strengthconnally.com>; wlee4@llln-law.com <wlee4@llln-law.com>; gparker@bradley.com <gparker@bradley.com>; roman.shaul@alabar.org <roman.shaul@alabar.org>; cbutler@dfhlaw.com <cbutler@dfhlaw.com>; ttp@manleytraegerlaw.com <ttp@manleytraegerlaw.com>; Devan@thebyrdfirm.com <devan@thebyrdfirm.com>; "devan@thebyrdfirm.com" <devan@thebyrdfirm.com>; chad.coker@alabar.org <chad.coker@alabar.org>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2026 at 05:04:37 AM CST
Subject: Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now
Dear University of Alabama President Mohler:
I am sending this email as part of trying to carry out in Alabama the plea of Robert Reich (Professor, former Secretary of Labor, Co-founder Inequality Media, 4.8M followers on Facebook) that is posted at Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now against... | Facebook.
Robert Reich's plea is this:
"Everyone with authority must speak out now against Trump's depravity and lawlessness. Every elected official, university, professional association, charity, and foundation head. Every CEO. Every religious leader. If they don't, history will condemn their cowardice."
Yesterday I sent a first email to Auburn University President Christopher Roberts, which email is posted at Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Robert Reich - Everyone with authority must speak out now.
This email to you is doing "double duty" by means of my copying on this email the members of the Alabama State Bar Executive Council.
Please, may you, as a person of authority rooted in the educational field in Alabama, and the members of the Alabama State Bar Executive Council, as persons of authority in the legal profession in Alabama, speak out now against Trump's depravity and lawlessness.
Thank very much.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
Mountain Brook

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Police departments protecting ICE protesters from violations of their rights

1/14/26 Email to Mountain Brook (AL) Mayor Smith and Police Chief Boulware
Using their office contact forms, I sent the below email to Mountain Brook (AL) Mayor Smith and Police Chief Boulware

Dear Mountain Brook Mayor Smith and Police Chief Boulware:
While this may not be relevant for Mountain Brook, I am suggesting for ICE protesters around the country that they request to meet with their police departments to discuss the rights of the people to protest ICE and to inquire of the police departments what the police departments will do and how they will do it in order to protect people from ICE violating the people's protest rights.
I intend to solicit Mountain Brook residents about whether they would like to meet with the Mountain Brook police department about this, if only for the purpose of signaling the concern of Mountain Brook residents about what ICE is doing around the country and that maybe the Mountain Brook police department will pass along to other Alabama police departments that residents in their jurisdictions may have similar concerns.
Thank you for your attention to this.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
3812 Spring Valley Circle
(205) 967-5586

Proposed Huntsville City Council resolution
[Residents of Huntsville have submitted to the Huntsville City Council the below resolution for adoption by the City Council.]
RESOLUTION ON HUNTSVILLE IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT:
Whereas the City of Huntsville values its immigrant community and seeks to improve race relations to promote cooperative, peaceful existence and equality for the community; and
WHEREAS, the immigrant community is a major contributor to Huntsville’s dynamic economic, scientific, medical, and cultural growth; and
WHEREAS, the stated mission of the Huntsville Police Department is to serve our community by protecting life, liberty, property and defending the constitutional rights of all people with compassion, fairness, integrity, and professionalism; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of protecting the safety, well-being, dignity, and Constitutional rights of all residents, including undocumented individuals; and
WHEREAS, the City of Huntsville seeks to ensure that all residents can access essential services without fear of deportation or discrimination; and
WHEREAS, local law enforcement agencies should focus on community safety and crime prevention rather than using valuable time and resources on enforcing federal immigration laws; and
WHEREAS, cooperation with ICE can lead to fear and mistrust within immigrant communities, discouraging individuals from reporting crimes or seeking assistance from law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, studies have shown that communities that foster trust between law enforcement and residents experience lower crime rates and improved public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Huntsville Alabama, that
1. The City of Huntsville shall not enter into any contract, agreement, or arrangement, such as the 287(g) program (8 U.S.C. § 1357(g)) that would grant federal civil immigration enforcement authority to its law enforcement officers.
2. The City of Huntsville shall not enter into any contract, agreement, or arrangement to detain or facilitate the detention of immigrants for federal immigration enforcement purposes.
3. The City of Huntsville shall implement training programs for local law enforcement personnel to ensure understanding of this resolution and to promote community policing practices that preserve Constitutional rights and build trust with all residents.
4. The City Council shall direct the Mayor to develop and implement policies that support this resolution and to report back to the City Council on the progress of these initiatives within six months.
5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval. ADOPTED this [Insert Date] by the City Council of Huntsville Alabama.

Email to Huntsville City Councilors
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: michelle.watkins@huntsvilleal.gov <michelle.watkins@huntsvilleal.gov>; david.little@huntsvilleal.gov <david.little@huntsvilleal.gov>; jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov <jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov>; bill.kling@huntsvilleal.gov <bill.kling@huntsvilleal.gov>; john.meredith@huntsvilleal.gov <john.meredith@huntsvilleal.gov>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 04:05:11 AM CST
Subject: Huntsville City Council proposed immigration enforcement resolution
Dear Huntsville City Councilors:
I am an Alabamian who is not a resident of Huntsville.
The United States is arguably on the verge of insurrections against ICE breaking out in the country, and the President of the United States is arguably on the verge of invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 against people in the streets and in their homes.
No one knows how this is going to turn out.
On one side, there is the Federal government and those in the country who adamantly support what ICE is doing and how ICE is doing it, and, on the other side, there are state officials and others who with equal adamancy oppose what ICE is doing and how it is doing it.
The parties on the two sides are increasingly antagonistic towards each other, and those in the middle are increasingly drawn into taking sides.
Local governmental authorities and local law enforcement are especially caught in the middle between protecting their residents and accommodating ICE doing its job.
The pressures on local governmental authorities and on local law enforcement are mounting as each day passes.
I am joined with tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people who are taking to the streets in protest of ICE.
I am aware of the resolution about immigration enforcement that the Huntsville City Council is considering.
I am sending this email to you to try to add to the pressure on local governmental authorities and local law enforcement to protect their residents against ICE.
Thank you for your attention to this email.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
3812 Spring Valley Circle
Birmingham, AL 35223
-----------
From: Kling, Bill <bill.kling@huntsvilleal.gov>
To: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 10:19:42 AM CST
Subject: Re: Huntsville City Council proposed immigration enforcement resolution
Rob,
We have no agreements with ICE, nor do we have any plans to do so. We do have a multi agency agreement to combat drug abuse, which includes homeland security among those several agencies. Again, we have no plans to enact any agreements with ICE.
Sincerely,
Bill Kling
----------
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: Kling, Bill <bill.kling@huntsvilleal.gov>
Cc: michelle.watkins@huntsvilleal.gov <michelle.watkins@huntsvilleal.gov>; david.little@huntsvilleal.gov <david.little@huntsvilleal.gov>; jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov <jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov>; john.meredith@huntsvilleal.gov <john.meredith@huntsvilleal.gov>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 12:02:45 PM CST
Subject: Re: Huntsville City Council proposed immigration enforcement resolution
Thank you very much for emailing me back, Mr. Kling.
Rob Shattuck
-----------
From: Robinson, Jennie <jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov>
To: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 at 10:57:26 AM CST
Subject: Re: Huntsville City Council proposed immigration enforcement resolution
Mr. Shattuck
Thank you for sharing your concerns. Immigrations matters are handled by the County Sherrif as a result, we are not considering any resolutions regarding ICE. Huntsville Police Department has no contracts with ICE. We have a Homeland Security agreement regarding Child Sex Trafficking but no agreements regarding immigration.
Jennie Robinson
City Council Representative District 3
jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov
Office: 256-427-5011
------------
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: Robinson, Jennie <jennie.robinson@huntsvilleal.gov>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 at 04:29:21 AM CST
Subject: Re: Huntsville City Council proposed immigration enforcement resolution
Thank you for replying to me, Ms. Robinson.
------------
[Note to Alabama Trump resisters: Please bolster this by doing your own emailing to whomever, such as to the Huntsville City Councilors, the Huntsville police department, Huntsville TV stations, etc. Please contact me if you would like to discuss such emailing. Thanks.]

1/15/26 Email I sent to Alabama Law Enforcement Agency using its website contact form
Re: Police departments protecting ICE protesters from violations of their rights
Using their office contact forms, I sent the below email to Mountain Brook Mayor Graham Smith and Police Chief Boulware:
Dear Mountain Brook Mayor Smith and Police Chief Boulware:
While this may not be relevant for Mountain Brook, I am suggesting for ICE protesters around the country that they request to meet with their police departments to discuss the rights of the people to protest ICE and to inquire of the police departments what the police departments will do and how they will do it in order to protect people from ICE violating the people's protest rights.
I intend to solicit Mountain Brook residents about whether they would like to meet with the Mountain Brook police department about this, if only for the purpose of signaling the concern of Mountain Brook residents about what ICE is doing around the country and that maybe the Mountain Brook police department will pass along to other Alabama police departments that residents in their jurisdictions may have similar concerns.
Thank you for your attention to this.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
3812 Spring Valley Circle
(205) 967-5586
I think many Alabamians are concerned about how ICE is operating in America (including possibly in Alabama), and such Alabamians wish for local police departments to protect people wherever they are who are exercising their rights to protest ICE. 
I am sending this email to the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency for whatever assurances it may offer to Alabamians that law enforcement in Alabama will seek to protect Alabamians against ICE violating the rights of Alabamians to protest ICE.
Thank you.

Draft of email for people to consider sending to their local governmental authorities and local law enforcement
Re: ICE
Dear ______:
The United States is arguably on the verge of insurrections against ICE breaking out in the country, and the President of the United States is arguably on the verge of invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 against people in the streets and in their homes.
No one knows how this is going to turn out.
On one side, there is the Federal government and those in the country who adamantly support what ICE is doing and how ICE is doing it, and, on the other side, there are state officials and others who with equal adamancy oppose what ICE is doing and how it is doing it.
The parties on the two sides are increasingly antagonistic towards each other, and those in the middle will likely be increasinly drawn into taking sides.
Local governmental authorities and local law enforcement are especially caught in the middle between protecting their residents and accommodating ICE doing its job.
The pressures on local governmental authorities and on local law enforcement seem mounting as each day passes.
I am joined with tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people who are taking to the streets in protest of ICE.
I am emailing you who are my local governmental authorities and my local law enforcement to add to the pressure on local governmental authorities and local law enforcement to protect their residents against ICE.
I hope many others are similarly emailing you or their other local governmental authorities and local law enforcement.
Thank you for your attention to this email.
Sincerely,

Email to Leeds Police Chief Paul Irwin regarding Yellowhammer news article "Leeds Police Chief warns against interfering with immigration arrests"
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: pirwin@leedsalabama.gov <pirwin@leedsalabama.gov>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2026 at 10:44:09 AM CST
Subject: Leeds Police Chief warns against interfering with immigration arrests
Dear Leeds Police Chief Irwin:
I do not live in Leeds, but I would like to ask some questions that are prompted by the Yellowhammer News article 'You might can do that somewhere else, but not here in Alabama': Leeds Police Chief warns against interfering in illegal alien arrests - Yellowhammer News.
My questions relate to what policy, if any, the City of Leeds and the Leeds police department have regarding the enforcement in Leeds of Federal immigration law and Alabama state immigration law.
First, do the City of Leeds and the Leeds police department have a policy regarding the enforcement in Leeds of Federal immigration law and Alabama state immigration law? If so, may I ask what such policy is?
Regardless of whether there is such policy of the City of Leeds and the Leeds police department, I would be interested in your personal views.
As regards removing illegal immigrants from the United States, are you in favor of the government undertaking and funding maximum legal efforts to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible, regardless of how indiscriminate the enforcement is, including disregarding of factors such as how long an illegal immigrant has been in the United States and what positive contribution, if any, the illegal immigrant has made and is making that benefits the United States economy or provides other benefits to the United States, and further, as part of such efforts, do you favor terrorizing immigrant communities to flush out illegal immigrants and asking people to report to authorities illegal immigrants of which people are aware?
If you do not personally favor the foregoing for deporting illegal immigrants, what do you suggest for how the government should go about deporting illegal immigrants?
Thank you for any answers you can provide to my questions.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
3812 Spring Valley Circle

Email to Wes Allen and Alabama sheriffs
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: WesAllenforAlabama@gmail.com <wesallenforalabama@gmail.com>; info@jeffcosheriffal.com <info@jeffcosheriffal.com>; sofacebook@shelbyso.com <sofacebook@shelbyso.com>
Cc: rick@rickpate.us <rick@rickpate.us>; info@nicoleforalabama.com <info@nicoleforalabama.com>; dean@odleforltgovernor.com <dean@odleforltgovernor.com>; Stewart Tankersley <drtank334@gmail.com>; info@PhillipEnsler.com <info@phillipensler.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 at 04:56:07 AM CST
Subject: AL sheriffs endorsing Wes Allen; immigration law enforcement
To Wes Allen and Alabama sheriffs (transmitted to Alabama Sheriffs Association via their website contact form):
The United States is convulsing over its immigration law enforcement.
I believe Trump can be fairly characterized as undertaking and funding maximum legal efforts to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible, regardless of how indiscriminate the deportations are, including disregarding of factors such as how long an illegal immigrant has been in the United States and what positive contribution the illegal immigrant makes that benefits the United States economy or provides other benefits to the United States. Further, as part of such efforts, Trump is terrorizing immigrant communities to flush out illegal immigrants and using maximum surveillance and information gathering to identify illegal immigrants.
It is probably the case that a majority of Americans do not want United States immigration law enforced the way Trump is endeavoring to enforce it.
Local government and local law enforcement are in the middle of this and what they say and do relative to enforcement of the immigration law is highly significant.
The news Wes Allen announces endorsements from sheriffs across Alabama in 2026 Lt. Governor race - Yellowhammer News prompts my seeking to ask Wes Allen and Alabama sheriffs to speak up in their official capacities and also to give their personal views.
So, to Wes Allen and Alabama sheriffs, I ask this: As regards removing illegal immigrants from the United States, in your official capacity and/or as a matter of your personal view, are you in favor of the government undertaking and funding maximum legal efforts to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible, regardless of how indiscriminate the deportations are, including disregarding of factors such as how long an illegal immigrant has been in the United States and what positive contribution the illegal immigrant makes that benefits the United States economy or provides other benefits to the United States, and further, as part of such efforts, do you favor terrorizing immigrant communities to flush out illegal immigrants and using maximum surveillance and information gathering to identify illegal immigrants?
If, in your official capacity or in your personal view, you do not favor the foregoing for deporting illegal immigrants, what do you suggest for how the government should go about deporting illegal immigrants?
Thank you for any answers you can provide to my questions.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
3812 Spring Valley Circle
Mountain Brook
(for filing in Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Police departments protecting ICE protesters from violations of their rights)
[Alabama Sheriffs Association confirmation
Your form has been submitted successfully.]

Email to Indivisible Mobile re Trump's private army comes to Alabama
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: indivisiblemobileal@gmail.com <indivisiblemobileal@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 at 06:08:01 PM CST
Subject: Trump's private army comes to Alabama
Dear Indivisible Mobile:
In the "What You Can Do" section of your Substack Trump's private army comes to Alabama - Indivisible Mobile, you put forth:
Ask your local police chiefs and sheriffs and mayors what their policy is about being used as immigration agents by the federal government, especially as those anti-immigrant efforts become more violent and unpopular with America.
I have initiated this as set out at Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Police departments protecting ICE protesters from violations of their rights.
I would like undertake this in an organized way with others.
Would Indivisible Mobile be interested in promoting such an organized effort?
Please let me know.
Thank you.
Rob Shattuck
Mountain Brook

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Getting AL TV stations to do better in 2026 elections

Email sent by a Facebook friend to Kerri Sutton, WVTM13 news director
From: 
Date: Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 5:31 PM
Subject: 5:00 News re: Portland shooting
To: kerri.sutton@hearst.com <kerri.sutton@hearst.com>
Although I am generally pleased with your news reporting, I was very disappointed in the way you presented the shooting of the married couple in Portland, Oregon by border patrol agents. While no one knows yet exactly what happened, your reporting leads viewers to believe these people were dangerous criminals. But from the New York Times “The police were alerted to the shooting on Thursday when the injured man called 911, according to Bob Day, Portland’s police chief. The immigration agents involved in the shooting were no longer on the scene when local officers arrived.”
Immigration agents failed to inform anyone that they had shot and injured two people and instead fled, leaving these injured shooting victims to an unknown fate. And if these individuals were so dangerous, why did they not pursue an arrest?
Please do better.
Cordially,
_______________

Friday, January 2, 2026

Other states' lawyers, Trump and rule of law

Email North Carolina State Bar, North Carolina Bar Association and UNC School of Law student organizations (North Carolina Law Review, the Federalist Society, First Amendment Law Review, and Carolina Public Interest Law Organization)
From: Rob Shattuck <rdshatt@aol.com>
To: general@ncbar.gov <general@ncbar.gov>; kwilliams@belldavispitt.com <kwilliams@belldavispitt.com>; rharrington@rbh.com <rharrington@rbh.com>; nclrev@unc.edu <nclrev@unc.edu>; cpfraley@email.unc.edu <cpfraley@email.unc.edu>; falr@unc.edu <falr@unc.edu>; cgrill@unc.edu <cgrill@unc.edu>
Cc: fhelmsing@joneswalker.com <fhelmsing@joneswalker.com>; jeff@rbmattorneys.com <jeff@rbmattorneys.com>; terri.lovell@alabar.org <terri.lovell@alabar.org>; jana@janagarner.com <jana@janagarner.com>; rbell@maynardnexsen.com <rbell@maynardnexsen.com>; jc@strengthconnally.com <jc@strengthconnally.com>; wlee4@llln-law.com <wlee4@llln-law.com>; gparker@bradley.com <gparker@bradley.com>; roman.shaul@alabar.org <roman.shaul@alabar.org>; cbutler@dfhlaw.com <cbutler@dfhlaw.com>; ttp@manleytraegerlaw.com <ttp@manleytraegerlaw.com>; Devan@thebyrdfirm.com <devan@thebyrdfirm.com>; "devan@thebyrdfirm.com" <devan@thebyrdfirm.com>; chad.coker@alabar.org <chad.coker@alabar.org>
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2026 at 08:19:11 AM CST
Subject: North Carolina lawyers, Trump and the rule of law
To North Carolina State Bar, North Carolina Bar Association and UNC School of Law student organizations (North Carolina Law Review, the Federalist Society, First Amendment Law Review, and Carolina Public Interest Law Organization):
I am a retired Alabama lawyer who has been unable to budge the Alabama State Bar to speak up publicly about Trump and the rule of law. See Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: The condition of the Department of Justice and its FBI and Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Alabama collaborator lawyers and Alabama resister lawyers.
I don't know the extent to which the North Carolina bar has spoken up publicly regarding Trump and the rule of law.
I hope the North Carolina bar has spoken up publicly regarding Trump and the rule of law.
If it has not, the purpose of this email is to urge such speaking up publicly.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
Mountain Brook, AL

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Which is better (or worse): socialism or crony capitalism?

1/5/26 WBRC6 News "6 on your Side"
I submitted to WBRC6 News "6 on your Side", using Share Your Tip, this message: "Which is better (or worse): socialism or crony capitalism? https://trumptweet.blogspot.com/2025/12/which-is-better-or-worse-socialism-or.html"
I checked the box saying I would be willing to speak to a reporter.

From: Jotform <noreply@formresponse.com>
To: "rdshatt@aol.com" <rdshatt@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2026 at 12:44:07 PM CST
Subject: We have received your response for WBRC Share Your News Tip

Jotform Logo

WBRC Share Your News Tip

NameROBERT SHATTUCK
Emailrdshatt@aol.com
Phone Number(205) 967-5586
Address3812 Spring Valley Circle, Mountain Brook, Alabama, 35223
Problem Description or Story Suggestion (Be as specific as possible)Which is better (or worse): socialism or crony capitalism?
https://trumptweet.blogspot.com/2025/12/which-is-better-or-worse-socialism-or.html
Client and partners have read Gray Local Media, Inc.'s Standard Terms and Conditions at https://graymedia.com/about/terms-of-use and agree to those terms in full.
Are you willing to speak to a reporter?Yes



Saturday, December 27, 2025

America's 250th birthday - Who cares?

At our dinner table
The following items were brought up for discussion at our Christmas Eve dinner table and at our Christmas Day dinner table:
1. I have called Trump's ICE actions as a "campaign of terror" against illegal immigrants. Is that a fair characterization? If Trump's ICE actions are a "campaign of terror" against illegal immigrants, do you support what Trump is doing? Or are you against what he is doing? (Previously someone I know personally said she was 110% in favor of what Trump is doing, giving this explanation: "I have been traveling for 25 years throughout Mexico for business. I have never been to tourist areas but business areas throughout country. The action of cartels is so much worse than even five years ago. The cartels have members on US side that are in constant contact with members on Mexican side. The Mexican police and many border agents are either paid off or scared to get involved so you have no one to turn to when confronted with an incident like with my employees.")
2. As regards politicians, does character matter? If you think character matters, what is your view of Trump's character, and how does it affect how you will vote in the mid-terms?
3. Does the United States have much more gun violence than other countries? If the answer is yes, what do you think should be done to reduce gun violence in the United States? (I sent to one of the persons at the dinner table the emails I have sent these past two weeks to Alabama university presidents and to Alabama churches that are posted at Citizens Acting to End the Trump Presidency: Targeted emailing re stricter gun laws).
4. How much do you think Trump is (and has been) motivated by gaining power, having power, increasing his power, and showing off to the country and the world his power, without regard to the good or bad consequences? If politicians generally desire gaining and exercising power, how do you compare how well institutions, the Constitution, rule of law and separation of powers in the United States effectively limit politicians in the amount of power they are able to gain and exercise, compared to how well the same are working to limit how much power Trump is gaining and exercising? Is there a very dangerous situation with regard to Trump in this matter of power?